Situated Cognition Theory: Benefits and Applications

What is Situated Cognition Theory?

Brown, Collins, and Duguid proposed the Situated Cognition Theory in 1989.

You can either read this blog or watch the video.

According to situated cognition theory, knowledge is not a product of the individual mind, but rather emerges from the interaction between people and their environment. This theory has important implications for education, as it suggests that learning should not take place in isolation, but rather in a social context. In fact, this theory has been used to develop the cognitive apprenticeship model, which provides learners with an environment where they can gain real-world skills while receiving guidance from a mentor or teacher.

In this video and blog, we will discuss the impact of situated cognition theory on education. We will also explore how educators can use this theory to create more effective learning environments for their learners!

Let’s look at some of the benefits and applications of situated cognition theory for Instructional Designers.

Benefits of Situated Cognition Theory

Situated cognition theory has several benefits that make it an attractive choice for instructional design projects. Here are some of the most important benefits:

Active Learning – This theory encourages learning through real-world activities, simulations, and experiments that require learners to think critically and act upon their knowledge and understanding.
The inseparability of Knowledge and Action – Unlike traditional learning methods, situated cognition emphasizes the inseparability of knowledge and action. In other words, as per this theory, knowledge is not only acquired through reading or lectures but also with activities related to the topic being studied.
Realistic Challenges for Learners – Situated cognition provides learners with realistic challenges that simulate real-world scenarios so they can test their understanding without risking failure outside of the learning environment.
Social Activities to Share Knowledge – Situated cognition fosters collaboration among learners by providing opportunities for them to share their knowledge and experiences in small groups or as part of larger projects or challenges.

Examples of Situated Cognition Theory in Practice

There are many examples where situated cognition has been used successfully in educational settings as well as professional training programs and business environments:

Case Studies from Educational Settings – There have been numerous case studies demonstrating the successful application of situated cognition principles in educational settings, such as problem-based learning or PBL activities and collaborative group work assignments that require team members to draw on each other’s strengths and weaknesses to complete tasks together successfully as a unit.
Existing Theories Adapted with Situated Cognition Principles – Many existing theories have been adapted with situated cognition principles, including constructivism, contextualized instruction, experiential learning, social constructivism, and cooperative learning theories. All these theories incorporate elements of situational awareness into their pedagogical approaches.
Examples in Business Environments & Professional Training Programs – Situated cognition has also been applied in professional training programs as well as business environments; for example, mentorship programs provide employees with direct access to experienced mentors who can guide them through difficult tasks as needed or provide advice on how best to approach similar problems in future situations outside the workplace setting.

Conclusion

In summary, situated cognition theory offers many benefits for instructional designers looking for ways to engage learners more effectively while developing valuable skills inside and outside the classroom or job site environment. Its focus on active learning, inseparability between knowledge and action, realistic challenges, application outside the learning context, and social activities creates an optimal environment for learners to grow professionally and personally.

Instructional designers should consider leveraging this model when designing their learning experiences. With its many advantages, training based on situated cognition could be just what they need!

Situated Cognition Theory FAQs

What Are Authentic Practices in Situated Cognition?

Authentic practices, within the context of situated cognition, refer to learning activities that closely mirror the tasks, challenges, and ways of thinking used by professionals and communities outside the classroom. Instead of relying solely on abstract problems or decontextualized drills, learners actively engage in real-world scenarios—much like a baker learning in a bustling Parisian kitchen, or an apprentice mechanic preparing vehicles for a Formula 1 pit stop.

Situated cognition suggests that knowledge is not best acquired in isolation or through rote memorization; rather, it’s developed through meaningful participation in genuine, socially embedded experiences. Think of math being learned not just from textbooks, but through solving the practical calculations required to manage inventory in a café or navigate discounts while shopping at Tesco.

In educational settings, this perspective calls for students to be part of a “community of practice.” Here, newcomers observe, imitate, and gradually take on more complex tasks, guided by mentors who provide scaffolding and support until the learner gains full competence. Activities are structured to replicate the work and thinking found in real environments: for science, this might mean investigating local ecosystems rather than only reading about them, or collaborating on experiments that echo the uncertainties and teamwork of modern research labs.

By grounding learning in authentic practices—be it through collaborative projects, inquiry-based experiments, or problem-solving rooted in daily life—students gain not only theoretical knowledge but also the adaptive skills, social strategies, and confidence used by experts in authentic communities.

Situated Cognition, Participation, and the Transfer of Learning

So, how exactly do situated cognition theories make sense of learning that spans across different communities, or explain how knowledge moves from one context to another? Let’s break it down.

Situated cognition suggests that learning doesn’t happen in a vacuum—our understanding develops as we participate in various social environments. When people are part of more than one community—think about how you might switch between collaborating with your work team and volunteering with a local club—each group has its own practices and ways of thinking. The theory explains that when you engage with multiple communities, you don’t just memorize facts or rules; you adapt, picking up new habits, perspectives, and problem-solving strategies as you go. This is what gives you flexibility and a richer toolkit for future challenges.

Transfer of learning, from a situated cognition perspective, isn’t simply a matter of taking something you’ve learned and plugging it into a new situation. Instead, it’s about being able to recognize what’s relevant from earlier experiences and applying it thoughtfully in new, often unpredictable, contexts. For example, a software developer who volunteers at a local school may not teach kids coding in the same way they collaborate with colleagues at Google or Microsoft, but the collaborative practices and communication skills gained in one setting can be creatively adapted in the other.

This focus on participation shows why situated cognition encourages educators to design learning experiences that mimic real-world environments and invite learners to join multiple communities of practice. When learners participate in diverse groups and reflect on their experiences, they become better at transferring knowledge and skills between different domains—a key to thriving both inside and outside the classroom.

How Situated Cognition Supports Inquiry-Based Science Teaching

Situated cognition has become a cornerstone for modern, inquiry-based approaches in science education. At the heart of this connection is the emphasis on “learning by doing,” where authentic, real-world tasks drive student engagement and understanding.

So, what does this look like in a science classroom? Instead of simply reading about scientific concepts, learners are invited to tackle open-ended problems—often with no single “right” answer. This means grappling with the natural messiness of scientific inquiry: dealing with uncertainty, ambiguity, and the collaborative back-and-forth that mirrors actual scientific practice.

Some key ways situated cognition powers inquiry-based science learning include:

Authentic Problem Solving: Students engage with genuine scientific challenges, working on tasks that mirror those faced by professional scientists, rather than just following prescribed steps from a textbook.
Social Learning: The classroom becomes a community of inquiry, where students share ideas, debate approaches, and learn from one another’s experiences—much like research teams in real labs.
Building on Prior Knowledge: Instead of starting from scratch, learners leverage what they already know, allowing their curiosity and understanding to shape the direction of their investigations.
Access to Expertise: With teachers or mentors acting as guides—not just information givers—students can draw on expert knowledge when needed, but are still encouraged to take initiative and develop their own solutions.
Development of Scientific Practices: Beyond memorizing facts, students participate in discourse, use scientific language, and share resources, gradually becoming more confident and capable contributors within the scientific community.

In short, situated cognition breathes life into inquiry-based science teaching by grounding learning in authentic practice, collaborative exploration, and meaningful problem-solving. This approach better prepares students for real-world scientific thinking and teamwork, both in school and beyond.

How Does Everyday Math Differ from School Math?

To better understand the impact of situated cognition theory, it helps to compare how math is used in real life versus the classroom. Researchers have found that the mathematics people use on the job or in daily activities—like calculating change while shopping or keeping track of inventory in a dairy—often looks quite different from what we see in textbooks.

One key difference? In real-world settings, math isn’t just about memorizing formulas or following a fixed set of steps. Instead, people choose problem-solving strategies that fit the unique demands of each situation, even when problems seem nearly identical on the surface. For example:

A grocery shopper might estimate prices in their head, rounding numbers to make quick decisions about what fits in their budget.
A factory worker could rely on practical shortcuts to tally products, drawing on experience rather than formal calculations.

These real-life methods are flexible and adaptive. They shift depending on context, which contrasts sharply with the standardized techniques emphasized in traditional math classes. So, according to situated cognition research, the mathematics used in day-to-day activities is deeply connected to the environment and specific challenges at hand—not just abstract rules taught in isolation.

Criticisms of Mainstream Cognitive Science from a Situated Cognition Lens

While situated cognition theory has gained traction as a powerful approach to understanding how people learn, it’s worth highlighting some of the criticisms it raises about traditional cognitive science models.

Limitations of Traditional Cognitive Science

Mainstream cognitive science (CS) has often been critiqued for treating the mind as an isolated processor—much like a computer—focused primarily on internal mental representations and abstract problem-solving. Proponents of situated cognition argue that this perspective can overlook the vital role of real-world contexts, environments, and social interactions in shaping what we know and how we think.

Key Criticisms Include:

Context Neglect: Critics point out that traditional cognitive science sometimes ignores the importance of context, assuming that learning and knowledge can be separated from the situations in which they’re used.
Overemphasis on Symbols: The abstract manipulation of symbols, a core idea in classic CS, may not accurately reflect how meaning and understanding actually develop—especially since in real life, our actions, environment, and tools are integral to thought.
Limited Social and Cultural Consideration: The social and cultural influences on learning, championed by thinkers like Vygotsky, have often played a minor role in mainstream models. Situated and distributed cognition research, in contrast, places these factors front and center.

Distributed Cognition: A Complementary Critique

Distributed cognition builds on these ideas by broadening the locus of thinking beyond the brain to include tools, artifacts, and collaborators. This field emerged largely in response to what some saw as an overly narrow focus of classic cognitive science, and its proponents frequently engage in dialogue with traditional models to highlight the untapped potential of broader, interconnected systems of thought.

Let’s look at some of the benefits and applications of situated cognition theory for Instructional Designers.

Expanding Cognition Through Body-Based Resources

Situated cognition theory doesn’t stop at hands-on activity—it also recognizes how we can harness our bodies to deepen understanding, even when we aren’t directly interacting with the environment.

For example:

Gestures aren’t just for emphasis during a presentation; they can actually help us think through problems or explain complex ideas to others.
Physical Representation of abstract ideas—a classic example is using your fingers to work through math, or walking out the passage of time or distance to make sense of a new concept.
Spatialization lets learners “map out” concepts in their minds, such as associating numbers with positions in space (think of imagining a number line) or physically grouping objects to represent quantities or sequences.
Offloading Cognitive Load is another powerful tool: jotting notes, arranging flashcards, or using physical tokens can reduce strain on working memory, allowing learners to focus more on reasoning and less on remembering.

By stretching the boundaries of what we “embody,” situated cognition empowers learners to creatively use body-based strategies—even decoupled from immediate tasks—to boost both understanding and recall.

Current and Future Research Directions in Situated and Distributed Cognition

As we look at the landscape of situated cognition theory—and its close cousin, distributed cognition—we see that both fields continue to spark interest and evolve in exciting ways.

Current Research Focus

Research on situated cognition often draws from foundational work by Vygotsky and Leont’ev, especially in the study of social and cultural influences on learning. Meanwhile, distributed cognition research expands on these ideas, exploring how knowledge is spread across people, tools, and environments (think: laptops, whiteboards, and even Post-it notes).

A major emphasis right now includes:

Knowledge Transfer: How do individuals apply skills and insights learned in one setting to entirely new contexts? This is crucial not only in classrooms, but also in professional and workplace training.
Participation Across Communities: There’s a growing interest in how learners move between, and contribute to, multiple social and professional groups—whether that’s collaborating on group projects, working in cross-functional business teams, or interacting with online learning communities.

Future Directions and Opportunities

While these are hot topics, the field is ripe for exploring other frontiers, too:

Deepening Disciplinary Learning: How do learners genuinely understand and adopt the core concepts of academic fields like math, science, or history? Research here can inform better curriculum design.
Designing Cognitive Tools: As we rely more on technology, there is increasing investigation into how tools (from apps to AI assistants) can genuinely support thinking and learning, rather than just store information.
Blending Theories in New Ways: There’s a trend toward integrating ideas from constructivism and experiential learning with situated cognition—creating richer, more nuanced models for both education and business training.

Both situated and distributed cognition traditions are thriving and expanding, with researchers actively exploring new avenues that promise to improve not only how we teach and learn but also how we interact in fast-changing professional environments.

How Situated Cognition Theory Addresses the Symbol Grounding Problem

One of the persistent questions in cognitive science is the so-called “symbol grounding problem”—in other words, how do mental symbols or representations acquire meaning, rather than just existing as abstract tokens? Situated cognition theory offers a compelling answer to this puzzle.

From the perspective of situated cognition, knowledge and understanding don’t develop in a vacuum. Instead, the meanings of concepts and symbols emerge naturally as people interact within real-world settings. It’s the context of action—social situations, hands-on activities, collaborations, and using tools—that gives mental representations their real significance. In this way, cognition is “grounded” in lived experience.

For example, when students learn about scientific concepts in a lab environment—mixing chemicals and observing reactions—they are not just memorizing terms or formulas. Instead, they come to understand those concepts through direct engagement. The symbols and vocabulary associated with chemistry gain meaning through the act of performing experiments and solving problems alongside others.

By connecting learning to authentic contexts and communities of practice, situated cognition theory helps bridge the gap between abstract knowledge and meaningful understanding.

The Role of External Cues in Human Planning and Problem-Solving

When we look at how people actually plan and solve problems, it’s clear that they’re not just working from memory or isolated thought. Real-world thinking often leans heavily on cues and tools that surround us. For example, we use maps to navigate unfamiliar roads, pay attention to signs, or ask someone nearby for directions. These external aids aren’t just nice to have—they’re essential parts of the thinking process.

In the same way, a whiteboard filled with scribbles in a team meeting, sticky notes outlining a workflow, or even sketches on a napkin, all become extensions of our minds. They help organize our thoughts, keep track of information, and spark solutions that might not have emerged if we just sat quietly and thought things through. Researchers have shown time and again that these environmental supports—like diagrams, written instructions, or anything visual—play a powerful role in helping us process information, make decisions, and ultimately solve problems more effectively.

How Examining Knowledge Content Sheds Light on Information Processing

When we look closely at the content of what people know—their specific understandings, mistakes, and even misconceptions—we gain valuable insights into how information is processed, stored, and organized in the brain. For example, if a learner commonly confuses certain concepts, it might reveal how those ideas are grouped or connected in their mental framework.

By analyzing these patterns—where learners excel, stumble, or misinterpret—we can piece together the underlying processes that shape their internal representations of the world. This approach helps theorists and instructional designers alike to identify the mental shortcuts, associations, and potential obstacles that emerge as learners interact with new material. Ultimately, the details of what someone knows serve as clues to the invisible ways their mind arranges information, which in turn helps shape more effective learning environments and instructional strategies.

Evidence for External Representations in Learning

Research also provides compelling evidence that our thinking doesn’t just happen privately in our minds—it is often “offloaded” into the world around us. Studies by researchers like Suchman and Hutchins, for instance, highlight how people frequently depend on environmental cues when making decisions or solving problems. Imagine planning a road trip: you probably rely as much on maps, street signs, or friendly directions from a local as you do on your own memory.

Other work, such as that by Zhang, has repeatedly shown how using tools like diagrams, written instructions, or even physical objects can help us work through complex problems more effectively. In short, these external representations—whether it’s a checklist or a group of colleagues brainstorming on a whiteboard—play a vital role in supporting our ability to plan, learn, and solve challenges in real life.

How Embodied Cognition Differs from Traditional Views

While traditional views of cognition—common from the 1950s through the 1980s—imagined the mind as a processor of abstract symbols, much like a computer, the embodied cognition perspective offers a major shift. Instead of separating thought from action and environment, embodied cognition argues that our thinking and learning are deeply rooted in our physical bodies and interactions with the world around us.

From this perspective, our cognitive abilities are not isolated “in our heads,” but rather, they develop from the need to navigate real-life situations—just as our ancestors did. In short, embodied cognition connects the dots between the basic problem-solving skills used by early humans and our more complex, modern thought processes, emphasizing learning that happens through doing, experiencing, and interacting.

This approach brings us closer to understanding why so many classroom concepts come alive when learners can physically interact with materials or practice skills in authentic settings.

The Role of Propositional Representations in Socially Situated Cognition

So, where do “propositional representations” fit into all this? When people interact in a learning environment—think group discussions, project teams, or even informal chats—clear communication hinges on everyone understanding what’s actually being said. Propositional representations are the underlying ideas or “propositions” that each person brings to the conversation.

In educational settings rooted in situated cognition, these propositions are essential. They help participants comprehend, negotiate, and build on each other’s ideas, rather than just trading surface-level responses. For example, if a group of students is working together to solve a problem, it’s not enough to just toss out facts; understanding the meaning behind what’s proposed ensures the group moves forward together.

By focusing on these shared meanings, collaborative learning becomes more effective, and everyone involved has a foundation for deeper understanding within real-world contexts.

Why Conversational Inferences Matter in Collaboration

When learners work together—whether they’re untangling a group project or role-playing a real-world scenario—they rely heavily on not just the words being said, but on deeper layers of understanding. This is where conversational inferences come into play.

At the heart of successful collaborative communication is the ability for participants to read between the lines—to make sense of implied meanings, intentions, and the context of what others share. These subtle mental leaps help group members follow along, connect their own expertise to the discussion, and bridge any gaps in collective knowledge. In short, inferences turn a simple exchange of information into true problem-solving, allowing everyone to stay on the same page and contribute meaningfully.

This process is especially important in instructional settings that use group work. For example, during a team debate or while brainstorming solutions, grasping the “big idea” behind a peer’s point is just as crucial as listening to the specific words used. It lets learners apply their own background knowledge, clarify misunderstandings, and move the whole group toward a common goal.

By nurturing these skills—through open conversation, active listening, and real-life scenarios—educators help learners become not just better communicators, but better problem-solvers and collaborators in any environment.

The Role of the Body in Situated Cognition

When thinking about situated cognition, it’s important to realize that our bodies play more than just a supporting role—they actually shape the way we think and learn. For example, theorists like Lakoff and Johnson have argued that the way we understand concepts is closely tied to our bodily experiences. Our senses, movement, and even the way we interact physically with our surroundings all feed into how our minds represent ideas.

This means that mental representations aren’t just abstract or floating around in our heads. Instead, the way we process information is deeply influenced by how we perceive and experience the world through our bodies. Think of metaphors like “grasping an idea” or “standing firm on an issue”—these expressions reflect how closely language and thought are connected to physical experience.

By appreciating this connection, educators and instructional designers can build learning experiences that are not only social but also embodied, encouraging learners to engage both mind and body in the educational process.

Progress in Understanding Embodied Cognition

Recent years have seen exciting advances in our understanding of how the body shapes our thinking, even in areas that seem purely “in the mind.” Researchers have discovered that our physical experiences play a key role in how we process language, grasp abstract concepts, and handle numbers and time. For example, there’s growing evidence that we use spatial thinking—like imagining a timeline or number line—to make sense of abstract ideas.

Gestures, too, are more than just hand-waving; they actively support our thought processes and help us remember or explain tricky concepts. In addition, studies show that we often offload information from our minds onto bodily movements or positions, freeing up our mental energy for other tasks. Collectively, these findings highlight how learners constantly draw on their bodies—often in creative ways that go beyond direct actions—to expand and support their cognitive abilities.

Embodied Cognition and Abstract Thought: Breaking Down the Challenge

You might be wondering: if situated cognition emphasizes real-world interaction, how does it explain our ability to grapple with abstract ideas—like numbers, time, or even language? This question has long puzzled researchers studying embodied cognition. For quite some time, the theory seemed best suited to explain thinking that closely aligns with physical activity, such as rotating objects in our mind’s eye or navigating through a game or diagram. But what about when we think about something we can’t directly see or touch?

Recent research has started to bridge that gap. Scientists have found that our brains often use bodily sensations, spatial reasoning, and gestures—even when dealing with abstract concepts. For example:

Understanding Language and Concepts: When we process language or abstract ideas, our brains sometimes engage the same systems we use for action and perception. So, even thinking about “time” might activate our internal sense of moving forward or backward.
Visualizing Numbers and Time: Many people imagine numbers on a mental number line or envision time in spatial terms (think “the weekend is ahead”). This mental mapping draws on our built-in sense of space.
Using Gestures: Teachers and students often use their hands to explain complex topics, and these gestures can actually help cement understanding—even abstract ones.
Body-Based Memory Tricks: Sometimes, we use physical actions or postures to help us remember information that isn’t directly linked to movement.

What’s truly fascinating is that we often “offload” bits of abstract thinking onto our bodies—like using our fingers to keep track of a list or shifting our posture when solving a tricky problem. Rather than being obstacles, these creative uses of our bodies help us manage the complexity of abstract thought.

In short, embodied cognition is expanding to account for abstract learning by showing how deeply our thinking is still tied to physical experiences—even for ideas that seem purely mental. This is a key insight for educators designing learning activities that make abstract ideas more tangible and memorable for students.

The Role of Conversational Dialogue in Collaborative Learning

When learners come together to solve problems or complete collaborative activities, conversational dialogue acts as the lifeblood of communication. These task-focused conversations are more than just exchanging words—they allow team members to build meaning together as they actively interpret, question, and apply information in the moment.

In these settings, effective dialogue helps:

Clarify ideas: By talking through concepts as a group, learners can clear up misunderstandings and arrive at shared definitions.
Encourage reasoning: Real-time discussion lets participants weigh different viewpoints and reason through challenges with support from peers.
Connect knowledge to context: Conversational exchanges anchor new information in the specific situation at hand, helping learners relate theory to practice.
Draw on background expertise: Each individual brings their own knowledge to the table, and through dialogue, these diverse perspectives enrich the group’s understanding.

For instance, when a group of students collaborates on a project, their insights and decisions don’t emerge in isolation—they spark to life in the back-and-forth of questions, suggestions, and feedback. This interplay ensures that everyone’s understanding is rooted in both the topic and the social context, reflecting the heart of situated cognition.

Why Is Decoupling from the Present Important in Human Cognition?

One remarkable aspect of human thinking is our ability to go beyond what’s right in front of us. We can picture events from the past, imagine possible futures, dream up far-off places, and grapple with abstract ideas that have no immediate presence in our environment. This flexibility isn’t just a neat mental trick—it’s a critical feature of cognition.

Why does this matter? Because the ability to “step outside” the here and now lets us plan, problem-solve, and innovate. We can learn from past experiences, anticipate challenges, visualize solutions, and even empathize with situations we’ve never personally encountered. It’s how a physicist models the universe, how a novelist builds entire worlds, and how we all make decisions about tomorrow based on memories and possibilities.

In short, decoupling from the present empowers us to think creatively, reason abstractly, and truly understand concepts that aren’t bound by immediate experience. This capacity is essential not only for academic learning but also for navigating the complexities of daily life.

Comparing In Vivo/In Vitro Approaches with Situated and Ecological Cognition

When we talk about studying how people think and learn, you’ll often come across the terms in vivo and in vitro—which may sound like something out of a medical drama, but they simply refer to different research settings. In vivo means studying cognition as it unfolds naturally, right in the thick of real-life situations. In contrast, in vitro involves taking those observations and theories and testing them out in controlled, laboratory environments.

Now, here’s the interesting part: these two approaches don’t stand in opposition to the ecological and situated perspectives on cognition. In fact, they complement each other. Like the situated cognition theory—which emphasizes that learning happens through authentic, contextual experiences—the in vivo approach values research conducted in real-world settings. However, the addition of the in vitro method means insights can also be put to the test under experimental conditions, helping researchers validate and refine their models.

Crucially, while some advocates of situated cognition might suggest that traditional lab-based studies (those “in vitro” moments) miss the mark, the combination of the two approaches actually bridges the gap. By alternating between naturalistic observation and controlled experiments, we get a fuller picture of how our minds work—not simply focusing on where we make mistakes, but revealing the ways our reasoning skills successfully adapt to different environments and tasks.

Why Is “Content” Important in Spatial Knowledge?

One area where situated cognition theory stands out is in its take on the “content” of what we know—especially when it comes to spatial knowledge. This is a topic with some lively debate among cognitive scientists.

In traditional cognitive science, the focus often lands on the mental processes behind learning—how we build, organize, and store information in our minds. From this perspective, the actual content (the specific facts or experiences) is sometimes treated as secondary, mainly serving to help researchers see how the mind works. For example, whether someone remembers a city’s street names accurately isn’t seen as crucial—what matters more are the processes that make memory possible, even if there are quirks or mistakes in what’s remembered.

However, proponents of situated cognition ask us to zoom out a bit. They argue that you can’t really untangle what’s in someone’s mind from the real-world context in which that knowledge developed. Context—like cultural background or social setting—shapes not just how we store knowledge, but what that knowledge actually is. So, when it comes to environmental or spatial understanding, the “content” isn’t just filler; it’s intertwined with the learning process itself, colored by the places, activities, and communities where learning takes place.

In short, this debate highlights a shift from seeing cognition as a set of abstract, internal processes, to seeing it as a living interaction between the mind and the world.

Key Theoretical Questions About Spatial Relations in Environmental Knowledge

When exploring how we come to understand our environment, especially through the lens of situated cognition, several important questions arise about the nature of spatial knowledge. Researchers are particularly interested in uncovering what kinds of spatial relationships—such as the relative locations and distances between objects—are most crucial for our cognitive maps.

Two main theoretical questions stand out:

What types of spatial relationships matter most?
Are people primarily encoding broad, general connections (think “that store is next to the park”) or more precise, measurable distances (like “the café is 300 meters north of the library”)? The answer may shape how instructional designers choose to help learners build environmental knowledge.
How do we decide which relationships are remembered, and when?
As we move through new environments, we can’t possibly remember every possible connection between every object. So, which spatial links become part of our mental map, and under what circumstances? Do we recall just a handful at first, perhaps focusing on clusters of landmarks or commonly traveled routes?

Some researchers suggest that to make sense of complex spaces, our minds group nearby objects together—forming smaller clusters where relationships are easier to track. By focusing on these clusters before connecting them, learners can gradually create richer, more usable knowledge of their surroundings.

This focus on the structure and limits of spatial understanding is a key concern for both researchers and instructional designers aiming to support effective learning in real-world contexts.

How Spatial Knowledge Models Handle Object-to-Object and Self-to-Object Relations

When it comes to making sense of our surroundings, models of spatial knowledge pay close attention to how we mentally organize the relationships between objects, as well as how we see ourselves in relation to those objects. Let’s break down how these two types of coding typically work:

Object-to-Object Spatial Relations:
These models focus on how we store and interpret the positions, directions, and distances between various objects in a given space. When new objects are introduced, the number of possible connections we might remember can skyrocket, much like adding new stops on a subway map. To keep things manageable, our minds often group objects into smaller clusters and code the relationships within each group. This helps prevent cognitive overload, especially in complex environments.
Self-to-Object Spatial Relations:
In contrast to object-to-object coding, understanding where we are in relation to objects often relies on constantly updating our mental “GPS” as we move through space. Because this process can be mentally demanding, most people only keep track of their position relative to a handful of nearby or especially important objects at a time. For larger-scale environments, we might first locate ourselves with respect to a small cluster of landmarks, then use our knowledge of how those landmarks connect to others to fill in the broader picture.

Ultimately, by blending both types of spatial coding—clustering objects together and focusing on a few key self-to-object relations—spatial knowledge models allow us to efficiently navigate classrooms, workplaces, or even new cities without getting lost in a tangle of data.

The Evolutionary Perspective on Embodied Cognition—And Its Limits

When we look at the roots of embodied cognition, we find an evolutionary perspective driving much of its reasoning. The basic idea is this: earlier models of cognition—think mid-20th century, lots of abstract symbols floating around in isolation—didn’t really connect with what our ancestors needed for survival. After all, humans didn’t evolve by solving logic puzzles in a vacuum; they adapted by interacting with their environment, responding quickly to real-world challenges.

This line of reasoning inspired researchers to emphasize how our thinking is deeply intertwined with our surroundings. Enter situated cognition: the view that our minds work best when grounded in actual, unfolding situations.

But here’s where it gets interesting—while this approach gives us valuable insights, it’s not the full story. Human cognition isn’t limited to what’s happening in the here and now. We also have the remarkable ability to step back from our immediate environment, imagine future scenarios, reflect on past experiences, and think about distant or entirely abstract concepts. This “decoupling” from the present is what allows us to daydream, plan, and reason about things well beyond our immediate physical context.

So, while the evolutionary argument for embodied and situated cognition helps us understand a lot about how we learn and interact, it shouldn’t be taken to mean all our thinking is chained to the moment. Our brains are wired to connect, envision, and generalize—a blend that underpins everything from storytelling to rocket science.

What is the Visual Index Hypothesis and How Does it Connect to Situated Cognition?

To get a little more granular, let’s talk about the visual index hypothesis—a concept that pops up a lot in conversations about situated cognition.

At its core, the visual index hypothesis suggests that our brains don’t just passively record what’s in front of us. Instead, we form direct, nearly preconscious connections between things we see in our environment (like objects, people, or even points of interest) and how we mentally represent them. Think of these connections as mental “pointers” that help us track and refer to specific objects, even as they move or change.

Why does this matter for situated cognition? Well, traditional theories often assumed that our brains just build mental models of the world in isolation, disconnected from the real, messy environment around us. But the visual index approach insists that these mental representations are inherently tied to our physical context—they’re actively anchored to what’s actually there, in real time.

For example:

When you’re following a bouncing ball at a playground, your brain isn’t endlessly analyzing every detail. Instead, it creates a quick “index” for the ball, letting you keep track of it instantly as it moves.
In a busy classroom, students can keep tabs on where their peers or the teacher are, almost effortlessly, using these mental pointers.

These visual indexes are important because they make it easier for us to interact with our environment and learn from it—just as the situated cognition theory describes. Rather than treating knowledge and perception as detached from the real world, both approaches emphasize how learning and understanding are rooted in ongoing, dynamic interactions with our surroundings.

So, when we talk about situated cognition and the visual index hypothesis, we’re really highlighting the importance of engaging with the world directly, and building knowledge through these hands-on, context-dependent processes.

Become a Better Instructional Designer

As an instructional designer, you always look for ways to improve your craft. Whether you are new to the field or a seasoned veteran, there is always room for improvement. One great way to sharpen your skills is by taking courses offered by Check N Click on Udemy. These courses offer practical, real-world advice you can use immediately. And best of all, they are very affordable. So what are you waiting for? Check out the course offerings today and get started on becoming a better instructional designer!

Enroll Now

About Check N Click

As a leader of your organization, you are always looking for ways to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of your learning and development programs. One way to do this is to outsource some of your eLearning needs to a reputable company like Check N Click. Check N Click has a team of experienced instructional designers and developers who can help you create custom eLearning solutions that meet your organization’s unique needs. In addition, outsourcing your eLearning needs can save you time and money in the long run. Contact Check N Click today to learn more about their eLearning outsourcing services.

Situated Cognition Theory: An Introduction, The Benefits, and Applications